16.5 C
Thursday, September 21, 2023
HomeEC Tax ReviewThe Contents of EC Tax Review, Volume 31, Issue 6, 2022

The Contents of EC Tax Review, Volume 31, Issue 6, 2022


Related stories

MBS To Fox: Saudi Arabia Will Get Nuclear Arms If Iran Does

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) said in an exclusive Fox News interview published Wednesday that Saudi Arabia will obtain a nuclear weapon if its number one regional rival does so first. "If they get one, we have to get one," MbS told Fox's 'Spe...

McCarthy Fails For 2nd Time To Advance Bill Funding Defense Department As Ukraine Sows Division

McCarthy Fails For 2nd Time To Advance Bill Funding Defense Department As Ukraine Sows Division Update(12:20ET): With Zelensky in Capitol Hill, and with Ukraine aid hanging in the balance, Kevin McCarthy has failed for a second time to adv...

The Permanent Strikes Continue: GM Joins Ford, Stellantis With Mass Layoffs As Result Of UAW Action

The Permanent Strikes Continue: GM Joins Ford, Stellantis With Mass Layoffs As Result Of UAW Action As the ill effects of the ongoing UAW strike continue, we will continue to document them.  First, we wrote about Stellantis looking to clo...

Nagorno-Karabakh Announces Readiness To Surrender Following Azerbaijan Offensive

The de facto Armenian administration of Nagorno-Karabakh declared its readiness to surrender to Azerbaijan, avoiding further bloodshed following the start of the latter’s offensive a day earlier.  The population of the region has been under Azerbaijani...

Fed’s Dots Imply Highest Treasury Yields Since 2000

Fed's Dots Imply Highest Treasury Yields Since 2000 By Ven Ram, Bloomberg Markets Live reporter and cross-asset strategist The resounding selloff in front-end Treasuries we have seen in this cycle isn’t done yet, with yields likely to re...

We are happy to inform you that the latest issue of the journal is now available and includes the following contributions:

Isabella Zimmerl, Reaching Cross-Border Tax Certainty With Joint Audits

The last few years have seen an increasing cooperation between tax authorities of Member States of the European Union by way of joint audits. This article shows how joint audits can provide an efficient solution to double taxation issues faced by internationally active companies. It centres on ways to amend and effectuate existing procedures of international tax law in light of experiences made with joint audits, focusing in particular on potential ways for more cross-border tax certainty. Furthermore, the article illustrates that an effective und legally certain reduction of international double taxation can best be reached by a stronger cooperation of tax authorities and the taxpayer/s. Finally, the author takes a look at recent developments in the field as well as the potential future of joint audits, emphasizing the need for more legally binding solutions.


Mart van Hulten & Ton Stevens, Is the Symmetrical Classification Method EU Proof?


One way to solve classification conflicts involving hybrid entities is for states to apply a so-called symmetrical classification method,  whereby a state adopts for its domestic tax purposes the tax classification applied to an entity by another state. The outcome of applying such a method can be that a state classifies foreign entities differently from domestic entities, raising potential issues from an EU law perspective when EU Member States are involved. For instance, in case a cross-border situation leads to more burdensome taxation compared to the domestic situation, a violation of the EU fundamental freedoms can be present, whereas if the classification leads to a lower tax burden for certain enterprises, a violation of EU State aid rules can be the result.

In this article, we assess the conformity with primary EU law of tax classification methods, and especially of the symmetrical classification method. It is concluded that the risk of incompatibility with the EU fundamental freedoms and EU State aid rules should typically be limited when EU Member States align their tax classification rules with those of other states to alleviate risks of double  (non-)taxation. Risks can increase, however, for instance if nationality is used as a distinguishing criterion, or where under- or overkill occurs.


María Carro Pitarch, Analysis of the (In)compatibility of Digital Services Taxes With State Aid Rules


After the recent agreements at a global level, some Member States of the European Union have paused their plans for Digital Services Taxes. However, others have decided to move forward with them as the global political agreement reached, while encouraging, has not been implemented yet. Therefore, it is still relevant to understand the nature of such taxes and, more importantly in the context of the EU, their possible (in)compatibility with state aid rules.

The purpose of this article is to shed light into these measures in a manner that encompasses all possible taxes. To establish the possible incompatibility of the taxes, an analysis is made passing through all the conditions for a measure to be considered as state aid and giving particular importance to the notion of selective advantage, which will be the determining factor if the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ever must pronounce itself on this matter.


Florian Haase, Repayment of Capital: A Real Evergreen Under German and EU Tax Law


The discussion about the tax consequences of a repayment of capital contributions made by corporations has been going on for years in Germany. Today, the issue has been defused, but uncertainties remain for non-EU corporations that make payments to their German shareholders.


Fabian Barth, CJEU Case Law on Exercising Rights Under EU VAT: Is There a Golden Thread in the Distinction Between Substantive and Formal Conditions?


Exercising rights under EU Value Added Tax (‘VAT’) law (for example recovering input tax) is often subject to certain conditions. A distinction however exists between substantive and formal requirements: Non-fulfilment of the latter does not need to be fatal for a taxpayer’s claim. That being the case, the question arises how a condition can be classified as either ‘substantive’ or ‘formal’. The author summarizes the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) in the area and notes that the Court has so far refrained from providing an all-encompassing test. The article therefore explores whether a golden thread can be identified and analyses if the Court may have had a general principle in mind when labelling conditions as ‘formal’ in judicial precedent.


More from our authors:

Schwarz on Tax Treaties, Sixth Edition Schwarz on Tax Treaties, Sixth Edition
by Jonathan Schwarz
€ 211


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here