10.8 C
Wednesday, March 22, 2023
HomeBiden Vs Trump Document Controversies Indicate Transparency Gap

Biden Vs Trump Document Controversies Indicate Transparency Gap


Related stories

Will TikTok Be Banned In The U.S.? CEO Shou Zi Chew Begs 150 Million American Users For Support Before Facing Congress.

There aren’t many things you can get Republicans and Democrats to agree to, but one is how TikTok data is accessible to the Chinese Communist Party. Yeah, that’s a problem, considering they are our enemy, and the CEO of TikTok is trying to appeal to t...

Batter industry could be worth $27 billion to Australian economy by 2030

The full battery opportunity won't be unlocked however unless Australia puts in the policy and industry legwork first. The post Batter industry could be worth $27 billion to Australian economy by 2030 appeared first on RenewEconomy.

Gasoline Prices Buck The Trend Ahead Of Driving Season

Gasoline Prices Buck The Trend Ahead Of Driving Season By Charles Kennedy of OilPrice.com With U.S. gasoline prices trending about 3 cents lower than the same time last week, analysts are now speculating that the banking crisis and broade...

“World’s biggest” solar and battery storage offtake deal to deliver giga-scale projects

Saudi developer secures agreements to build three solar plus storage projects in one of the world’s largest power purchase deals. The post “World’s biggest” solar and battery storage offtake deal to deliver giga-scale projects appeare...

Zelensky Invites China To Discuss Peace After ‘No Breakthrough’ In Xi-Putin Meeting

Zelensky Invites China To Discuss Peace After 'No Breakthrough' In Xi-Putin Meeting Ukraine appears willing to engage China in mediation efforts to end the war, at a moment China's Xi Jinping is in Moscow discussing Beijing's own 12-point ...
Biden Vs Trump Document Controversies Indicate Transparency Gap

Authored by Petr Svab via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

The government has been less than transparent with Americans regarding the classified documents scandal of President Joe Biden, and particularly on the background of the classified documents scandal of former President Donald Trump.

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is joined by U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois John Lausch during a news conference at the Justice Department to announce the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the discovery of classified documents held by President Joe Biden at an office and his home, in Washington on Jan. 12, 2023. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

While in Trump’s case, the public was treated to frequent updates through leaks to media and official statements, the Biden case had been kept under wraps for more than two months and then disclosed in stages.

When staff of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) picked up 15 boxes of presidential records from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Florida residence in mid-January 2022, The Washington Post reported it three weeks later and the NARA confirmed the story that same day, Feb. 7, 2022, adding a 150-word quote from then-Archivist David Ferriero explaining that “the Presidential Records Act is critical to our democracy.”

About a week later, NARA revealed in response to a congressional inquiry that classified material was found in the boxes and the matter had been communicated to the Department of Justice (DOJ). In April, The Washington Post reported the DOJ was investigating the matter and later that month C-SPAN released an interview with Ferriero during which he confirmed the existence of the investigation.

In the Biden case, when NARA was alerted on Nov. 2 that classified documents were found in Biden’s office at the Penn Biden Center, where he sparsely lectured and gave speeches from 2017 to 2019, there were no leaks forthcoming. In fact, NARA has yet to issue a single press release on the Biden case.

The story was first leaked to CBS News and reported on Jan. 9 with an on-record confirmation by Richard Sauber, special counsel to Biden.

The CBS report came a day after Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) pledged in a Mark Levin interview that his oversight committee will question NARA on its handling of the Trump documents case and threatened to withhold the agency’s funding to force compliance with information requests.

In a Jan. 10 letter to NARA, Comer said its “inconsistent treatment of recovering classified records held by former President Trump and President Biden raises questions about political bias at the agency.”

NARA responded a week later, saying it “treats all of its communications with the White House, DOJ, and the representatives of the former Presidents (and Vice Presidents) as presumptively confidential” and “for this reason, NARA did not affirmatively discuss or disclose to our oversight committees or to the public our activities concerning the return to our custody of either the Biden Vice Presidential records or the Trump Presidential records, or our referral of both matters to DOJ because we found classified information.”

The agency started to respond to congressional inquiries on the matters “only when those topics were subsequently reported publicly in the press.”

Our actions and responses with respect to both of these matters have been entirely consistent and without any political bias,” it said (pdf).

The DOJ was alerted by NARA about the Biden documents on Nov. 4, but the FBI didn’t start to look into the matter until Nov. 9, the day after the midterm elections.

The White House confirmed the initial story the day it was released, but didn’t disclose for another three days that another batch of classified documents were found in Biden’s garage, even though the DOJ was informed by Biden’s lawyers on Dec. 20.

The government response indicates that Biden’s pre-election promises of a transparent administration have fallen short, according to investigative journalist John Solomon.

Was this an act of defiance on his promise of transparency?” he asked, noting that it appears that “the president says he wants to be transparent, but he doesn’t always deliver on the promise when things are unflattering to him or his presidency.”

Solomon argued that the DOJ should have been more forthcoming about the Biden documents issue, especially since Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed a special counsel to oversee the Trump documents investigation on Nov. 18, when his department was already probing the Biden documents case.

They knew when they made that announcement that the current President has similar issues and they chose to keep it from us,” Solomon told The Epoch Times.

Tyler Durden Sat, 01/21/2023 - 16:30


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here