3 C
London
Saturday, January 28, 2023
HomeFacebook Reinstates Trump After Two Years With "New Guardrails In Place"
Array

Facebook Reinstates Trump After Two Years With “New Guardrails In Place”

Date:

Related stories

Escobar: Can You Smell What The Year Of The Rabbit Is Cooking?

Escobar: Can You Smell What The Year Of The Rabbit Is Cooking? Authored by Pepe Escobar, The New Silk Roads, or BRI, as well as the integration efforts of BRICS+, the SCO and the EAEU will be on the forefront of Chinese policy... Liu H...

Visualizing Remittance Flows & GDP Impact By Country

Visualizing Remittance Flows & GDP Impact By Country The COVID-19 pandemic slowed down the flow of global immigration by 27%. And, as Visual Capitalist's Richie Lionell details below, alongside it, travel restrictions, job losses, and mo...

Canada’s Bill C-26: Yet Another Government Power Grab

Canada's Bill C-26: Yet Another Government Power Grab Authored by Mark Jeftovic via EasyDNS.com, Soviet Era Ethos Stomps Privacy and Due-Process Another doozy from the Canadian government. Following along several other bills winding t...

Thai Rice Prices Jump As Global Food Crisis Reignites

Thai Rice Prices Jump As Global Food Crisis Reignites Soaring rice prices is the latest example of persistent food inflation. The grain is responsible for feeding billions of people, and prices were relatively stable last year while wheat ...

Here’s What Happens To Society When The System Fails

Here's What Happens To Society When The System Fails Authored by Fabiann Ommar via The Organic Prepper blog, When the system begins to fail, society can quickly crumble. Two such events have occurred recently... Let’s reflect on the Br...
Facebook Reinstates Trump After Two Years With "New Guardrails In Place"

A little more than a week after the Trump campaign urged Facebook parent Meta to lift the ban on the former president, the social media giant has agreed to reinstate him on both Facebook and Instagram after a two-year ban, according to Nick Clegg, Meta's president of global affairs.

"We've always believed that Americans should be able to hear from the people who want to lead the country," Clegg said.

"We don't want to stand in the way of that."

As Meta wrote in a lengthy blog post:

"Social media is rooted in the belief that open debate and the free flow of ideas are important values, especially at a time when they are under threat in many places around the world. As a general rule, we don’t want to get in the way of open, public and democratic debate on Meta’s platforms — especially in the context of elections in democratic societies like the United States.

The public should be able to hear what their politicians are saying — the good, the bad and the ugly — so that they can make informed choices at the ballot box. But that does not mean there are no limits to what people can say on our platform. When there is a clear risk of real world harm — a deliberately high bar for Meta to intervene in public discourse — we act.

...

We know that any decision we make on this issue will be fiercely criticized. Reasonable people will disagree over whether it is the right decision. But a decision had to be made, so we have tried to make it as best we can in a way that is consistent with our values and the process we established in response to the Oversight Board’s guidance."

Interestingly, Meta's Oversight Board wrote its own blog post distancing itself from the decision: 

Today’s decision by Meta is a pivotal moment in the debate over the best way to handle harmful content posted by politicians on social media.

Today’s decision to reinstate Mr. Trump on Meta’s platforms sat with Meta alone — the Board did not have a role in the decision.

As Nick Clegg noted, "I am the the ultimate decision maker on these kinds of issues in the company."

Cue the outrage mob explaining how this will end democracy as we know it...

Despite all the fearmongering, Jameel Jaffer, executive director at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, says "this is the right call"...

"...not because the former president has any right to be on the platform but because the public has an interest in hearing directly from candidates for political office. There are narrow circumstances in which social media platforms really have no choice but to take down political leaders’ posts - which is why we endorsed Meta’s decision to suspend Trump’s account when he used it to encourage violence. In most circumstances, though, it’s better if the major social media platforms err on the side of leaving speech up, even if the speech is offensive or false, so that it can be addressed by other users and other institutions.”

Additionally, Katie Fallow, senior counsel at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, points out that "big tech platforms already exercise a huge amount of power over public discourse online. In general, we don’t want them also deciding which political leaders we hear from and which ones we don’t."

Former President Trump has responded in his usual under-stated manner:

Trump was banned from the platform shortly after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

The reinstatement of Trump's accounts will allow him to run ads via his Facebook and Instagram pages, which have 34 million and 23 million followers, respectively.

  • Trump relied heavily on Facebook ads in previous election cycles for fundraising and list-building.

  • Under Elon Musk, Twitter has also reinstated Trump's account, but he has not posted yet, continuing to rely on his account at Truth Social instead. -Axios

That said, Clegg warned that "We just do not want — if he is to return to our services — for him to do what he did on January 6, which is to use our services to delegitimize the 2024 election, much as he sought to discredit the 2020 election."

Trump's accounts will not be reinstated immediately, as Meta engineers will need time to build in nanny capabilities to restrict certain posts or ad capabilities in the future, if needed.

The former president will be subject to new policies governing accounts by public figures during periods of civil unrest - under which Meta can restrict the account for between one month and two years.

  • More serious violations will merit either a six or 12-month restriction from creating content or a full account restriction for two years, if severe.

  • Trump will also be subject to a crisis policy protocol, introduced by Meta in August, that will consider both on and off-platform risks of imminent harm to evaluating whether the actions or speech of any public figures requires sanctioning.

  • "If he now posts further violating content, that content will be removed, of course, and he could be suspended for between one month and two years, depending on the severity of the violation," Clegg said. -Axios

Interestingly, Trump has an exclusivity deal with his social media company, Truth Social - which requires him to "first channel any and all social media communications" to Truth for at least six hours before cross-posting the content to other platforms, according to SEC filings. That agreement expires in June, according to Rolling Stone, which notes that it would be right around when Republican primary season begins to heat up.

Tyler Durden Wed, 01/25/2023 - 17:21

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here